University of Hawai‘i at Manoa
Department of Linguistics
Tuesday Seminar
Fall
2005
St. John Hall 011
12:00p.m.-1:15p.m.
| Date | Presenter |
Title |
|
10/11/05 |
Yumiko Enyo <enyo@hawaii.edu> Department of Linguistics University of Hawai'i at Manoa ![]() |
A case study of gender performance and prosody
in Japanese sentence-final particles Prosodic features of Japanese ‘women’s language’ include prolonged sentence ending, wider pitch range and
final rising pitch contour, especially on sentence-final particles (Eda 2000),
although men often use
feminine features (Okamoto, 1995).
Crucially, speakers construct their identity by drawing linguistic
resources available to the community (Cameron & Kulick 2003), and Hiramoto
& Wong (2004) investigated prosodic features in performance by both men and
women to illustrate the ideology of Japanese ‘men’s/women’s language.’ However, there is no study on the
relationship between a speaker’s working experience and gender performance to
investigate two common beliefs: men’s/women’s language distinction is developed
during working experiences (Kawanari 1993), and speakers’
perception of men’s/women’s language influences their gender performance. This study aims to fill the gap in the study by
focusing on intonational features at sentence endings to examine what prosodic features Japanese speakers use to differentiate masculine and feminine styles (hereafter STYLES), and how their choice of
intonational cues relates to the language-external factors. The data for this study are the recordings of sentence readings by ten male
and ten female Japanese native speakers with Tokyo dialect.
Each speaker plays both gender roles in the casual setting. The two sentences for the reading task end in
the gender-neutral sentence-final serial particle yo.ne, and each sentence is repeated twice.
Each gender performance by a speaker is
compared, focusing on the yo.ne segment. Eight speakers made distinction between
STYLES in both two sentences, and seven did in only one sentence. Men made more distinction between STYLES than
women (P=.0374). Women with working
experience made more distinction in STYLES (P=.0085), while men do not have the
same pattern. Thus, it partially confirms
previous claims. Scoring system for each linguistic factor
is introduced in order to gauge if a participant’s performance matches expected
results from previous researches. Since
longer yo.ne in feminine performance
is expected, each speaker’s yo.ne
duraiton in both STYLES are compared
for each sentence. When a speaker
performed longer yo.ne in portion for
his/her feminine style of a sentence in average, the performance for the
sentence receives one point. Similarly,
wider range in feminine performance and final rising pitch contour (higher than
30 Hz) receive one point for each. The
result indicates that women with working experience utilized final rising
contour more than women without working experience (P=0.0133). Two language attitude criteria emerged
from follow-up interviews: (1) whether a speaker believes that ‘men’s language’
and ‘women’s language’ differ in current Japanese language use, and (2) whether
the speaker wants to see a ‘men’s/women’s language’ distinction in the
future. Statistical analysis shows that
it is women that are influenced significantly by two criteria of language
attitudes (P=.0234 and P=.0315 respectively).
|